Prince Harry has been told he can "rot outside" by commentator Adam Brooks after appealing his security arrangements against the Home Office.
The Duke of Sussex made the 5,000 mile trip to the UK to attend his two-day appeal hearing at the High Court - at the same time as his father King Charles made history in Italy, addressing the Italian Parliament in their native language.
In the arguments made to the court, Prince Harry's barrister has claimed the Duke's "life is at stake" due to the removal of his full taxpayer-funded security protection.
Speaking to GB News, commentator Adam Brooks argued that the Sussexes "do not deserve security" in the UK after their fallout with the Royal Family.
Adam Brooks hit out at the Duke's appeal against the Home Office
Reuters / GB News
Brooks fumed: "I still believe that Harry and Meghan should have nothing to do with the Royal Family.
"They ripped it apart, they tarnished the reputation of the Royal Family around the world, and he can rot outside it. He doesn't deserve any security, in my opinion."
He declared: "Prince Harry should not have taxpayer funded security."
Delivering his verdict on whether Prince Harry should have security in Britain, Director of the Popular Conservatives Mark Littlewood claimed that the Duke "should not have security" as he "made the decision" to depart from royal duties.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
Prince Harry was escorted out of a High Court hearing today by his bodyguards after a supporter disrupted proceedings
GettyLittlewood explained: "He should not be getting it. He has made his decision to absent himself from royal duties. The security, at least around the clock, should be attached to doing those duties on a case by case basis.
"We could provide him with security, just as we do with any other person on a case by case basis, but not round the clock, not on the basis of his royal status."
Offering a defence for Prince Harry, Commentator Nina Myskow admitted it "really pains her" to see the "waste of a great royal".
She told GB News: "Britain has bought the stories pushed by the palace and perpetrated by the media, and it really pains me to see just what a waste of a great royal Harry was.
Brooks told GB News that Harry and Meghan 'do not deserve security'
GB News
"He's not asking for round the clock, what he actually was originally asking for was when he wasn't getting his own security was if he could bring his own armed security, and pay for it himself.
"He didn't want the taxpayers to pay for it, so he said he'd pay for it himself, but he's not allowed to do that."
At the conclusion of the hearing, Sir Geoffrey Vos said the Court of Appeal's decision would be given in writing at a later date, which was "most unlikely" to be before Easter.
"Plainly we will take our time to consider our judgments," he added.
