'This is the worst case of broken Britain I’ve ever come across,' says Patrick Christys

'This is the worst case of broken Britain I have come across,' says Patrick Christys

GB NEWS
Patrick Christys

By Patrick Christys


Published: 16/04/2025

- 22:39

Updated: 17/04/2025

- 08:15

OPINION: Patrick Christys shared what he called "the most insane" immigration case

I have found the most insane immigration story in British history. Get a load of this.

We won’t deport one of the most dangerous terrorists in Britain — a man who wants to leave — because of human rights concerns.


Irfan Khalid planned to set off eight bombs in Birmingham. This would have been Britain’s 9/11. Bigger than 7/7. One of his accomplices, Ashik Ali, was going to wear a suicide vest and shoot people as well.

In 2013, Irfan Khalid was jailed for a minimum of 18 years. He was granted a parole hearing.

Here at Patrick Christys Tonight, we’ve obtained documents from that hearing. Just for context — he was denied parole because he’s still considered a dangerous, radical, murderous Islamist.

What these documents reveal is astonishing. I honestly think this is the worst case of broken Britain I’ve ever come across — and that is a competitive field.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Khalid has renounced his British citizenship. He’s just a Pakistani national now — not British. The Home Office wants to deport him. The public, undoubtedly, wants to deport him. He wants to deport himself. In fact, Canada signed a disclaimer letter confirming that Khalid wants to voluntarily return to Pakistan.

This jihadi lunatic is begging us to send him back. So get ready for this...

The parole documents say Khalid is subject to a deportation order — but it’s not enforceable due to human rights concerns.

In applying the legal test for release, the panel was required to consider the manageability of Mr Khalid’s risk to the public in both the UK and any other country he’s likely to be returned to. Once returned to Pakistan, it would then be a matter for Pakistan to determine how to manage and monitor his risk. The panel noted that in such circumstances, they would need to rely on Mr Khalid to manage himself safely.

Let that sink in. We have a jihadi who literally wished death upon us. He wanted to blow up Birmingham, killing as many people as possible. He now wants to leave the country — in fact, he's begging us to let him go. And human rights activists in Britain are saying he has to stay.

We went back to the Parole Board and asked them to clarify what exactly these human rights concerns were. They couldn’t give us any more details — but we suspect it’s because they’re worried Khalid might pose a risk to others, and that their human rights might be affected.

Okay. But if they're concerned about the rights of people in Pakistan, that’s not our jurisdiction, is it? That’s for the Pakistani authorities to deal with.

Why is it our problem? Why do we have to live with this lunatic?

Patrick Christys

Patrick asked "why do we have to love with this lunatic?"

GB NEWS

It’s one thing for Britain not to deport people who illegally cross the Channel. It’s already bad enough that we’ve let paedophiles stay in the country because their children might suffer if they're deported. We've had cases so ridiculous, you almost have to laugh — like the Albanian drug lord who was allowed to stay partly because his son didn’t like foreign chicken nuggets.

But this? This is something else entirely.

Here we have it: a card-carrying jihadi, who tried to blow up Birmingham in the name of Allah, still poses a threat to society, and is begging to be sent to Pakistan — and yet British human rights lawyers are keeping him right here.

Have you ever heard anything quite as insane as that?