It's time to sack Home Office staff.
Home office advisers looked at the Southport incident and used it as an opportunity to downplay Islamist extremism and class more people as far right.
They spent five months writing a report into the counter-terror program. Prevent. They ignored the fact that Islamists are responsible for 95 per cent of terror related deaths since 1999 and 88 per cent of injuries, and they decided to class jihadi terror at the same level as the movement for Sikh Independence and the Earth Liberation Front.
At the same time, they wanted people who dare to mention two tier policing or taxpayers money spent on migrant hotels to be classed as far right.
Patrick Christys demands Home Office sackings and reveals 'Muslim network'
GB News
They said that Pakistani rape gangs were alleged grooming gangs and they only mentioned them in the context of far right people using them to whip up racial hatred. They are a disgrace and should be sacked for that alone in my view.
The Government got in touch to tell us that they would be rejecting the findings of said report. So at minimum, Those who wrote it should be sacked for doing bad work, shouldn't they?
Like in any other business, former Immigration Minister, now Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick has called for them to be fired. But for me, the real problem is deeper. It's cultural.
So let's look at the circus going on behind the scenes. The Permanent Secretary to the Home Office is a diversity and faith champion. He can't even answer basic questions about illegal immigration.
Let's look deeper behind the scenes. GB News has uncovered the Home Office Muslim network - leaked documents show the group of over 700 civil servants say they aim to "promote the recruitment, retention and progression of Muslim staff in the Home Office" and "influence policy makers so that policy is more inclusive of Muslim needs".
A Home Office whistleblower told GB News: "Having an Islamic lobby group inside the Home Office represents a serious threat to the government's aims in combating Islamic extremism and granting asylum to those fleeing Islamic countries over religious persecution".
Is it any wonder that backroom staff at the Home Office want to see people like you treated as far right terror threats for pointing out cultural problems? Is it any wonder they don't seem to think that Pakistani rape gangs are a massive problem? Is it any wonder that despite the man who reviewed prevent in 2023 saying they need to focus on Islamism and less on the far right? At the very first opportunity they got, they did the exact opposite.
No, it's not a shock, is it? But it gets worse. Keir Starmer appeared to say that police officers should focus less on non crime hate incidents in the wake of the Allison Pearson scandal a few months ago, but now it looks like the bit of the report that this Government does want to adopt is clamping down on more non crime hate incidents.
So the upshot of the Southport massacre which prompted this review in to prevent the upshot of that, you know where need I remind everyone that three little girls were killed in the most brutal fashion by depraved lunatic who had been reported to prevent three times and was known to police. The upshot of that is for police to spend more time dealing with Hurty words.
In the past year, police have dealt with incidents like a rude word being spelt with alphabet cups in Tesco's and a member of the public being upset about the name of a dog. Two things here, two very important things.
There is clearly, in my view, a rotten culture at the Home Office infested with diversity and inclusion nonsense, and they need to be sacked and cleared out.
Secondly, have you ever known a Government more out of touch than this? It wasn't hurty words that killed those little girls in Southport, Mr. Starmer.
