Donald Trump's classified documents case dismissed by Florida judge

Donald Trump's classified documents case dismissed by Florida judge

GETTY IMAGES
George Bunn

By George Bunn


Published: 15/07/2024

- 15:14

Updated: 15/07/2024

- 16:26

It has been ruled that the prosecution did not have the authority to bring the case against the former President

A judge has dismissed the criminal case accusing Donald Trump of illegally holding onto classified documents.

Florida-based US District Aileen Cannon, who was nominated by Trump, ruled that Special Counsel Jack Smith, who is leading the prosecution, was unlawfully appointed to his role and did not have the authority to bring the case.


The ruling is likely to be appealed by the prosecution.

It marked another legal victory for Trump, following the US Supreme Court ruling that, as a former President, he enjoyed immunity from prosecution for many of his actions in office.

Trump

The ruling is a victory for the former President

Getty

Courts in other cases have repeatedly upheld the ability of the US Justice Department to appoint special counsels to handle certain politically sensitive investigations.

But Justice Cannon’s ruling throws the future of the case, which once posed serious legal peril for Trump, into doubt.

Smith is also prosecuting Trump in federal court in Washington over his attempts to overturn the 2020 election, but his lawyers have not made a similar challenge to the special counsel in that case.

In the documents case, Trump was indicted on charges that he wilfully retained sensitive national security documents at his Mar-a-Lago social club after leaving office and obstructed government efforts to retrieve the material.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

TrumpTrump is facing off against Biden in the polls in NovemberPA
\u200bTrump's Mar-A-Lago Resort

Trump's Mar-A-Lago Resort

GEtty

Two others, Trump personal aide Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager Carlos De Olivera were also charged with obstructing the investigation.

Trump’s lawyers challenged the legal authority of Attorney General Merrick Garland’s 2022 decision to appoint Smith to lead investigations into Trump.

They argued the appointment violated the US Constitution because his office was not created by Congress and he was not confirmed by the Senate

Lawyers in Smith’s office disputed Trump’s claims, arguing there was a well-settled practice of using special counsels to manage politically sensitive investigations..

Donald Trump gestures with a bloodied face after being shot at a rally

Donald Trump gestures with a bloodied face after being shot at a rally

Reuters

The ruling is the latest and most consequential in a series of decisions from Cannon favouring Trump’s defence and expressing scepticism about the conduct of prosecutors.

The judge previously delayed a trial indefinitely while considering a flurry of Trump’s legal challenges.

In an unusual move, she allowed three outside lawyers, including two who sided with Trump, to argue during a court hearing focused on Trump’s challenge to Smith’s appointment.

You may like