POLL OF THE DAY: Should we house asylum seekers in empty properties? YOUR VERDICT

Jose, 76, and Ted Saunders, 78, moved into their property recently, just before a compulsory purchase letter came through the letter box asking the couple to sell their £200,000 home in order to accommodate asylum seekers.

In an exclusive poll for GB News membership readers, an overwhelming majority of 95 per cent of those who voted in the poll thought asylum seekers should not be housed in empty private properties.

Just four per cent said they agree that these properties should be used to house asylum seekers.

The letter North Northamptonshire Council labelled the mid-terraced Rushden home empty or “derelict” leaving the couple “insulted and shocked”.

Jose, a retired carer, told the Daily Mail: “The idea of forcing us to sell it to make room for refugees and asylum seekers seems totally wrong.”

She added: “What on earth is the council doing forcing people to sell their houses – and even an empty house is owned by someone – so that asylum seekers can live in them?”

• WATCH: Officers raid barbershop employing migrants as criminal gangs exploit high-streets
• Steve Wright found dead after emergency services called to home over 'incident'
• Wales election: Former Labour leader endorses Vaughan Gething to lead country

The letter sent to the Saunders, which was headed “Empty properties and sites initiative”, said: “We are writing as we have reason to believe that the above-named premises… is empty or unused.

“The Government has identified empty privately-owned properties as a potential cause of blight within communities, and as a wasted resource at time of high housing need.”

Jason Smithers, Leader of North Northamptonshire Council, said in a statement: “North Northamptonshire Council (NNC) is working with owners of long-term empty properties to bring their property back into use.

“Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPO) are not utilised to ‘oust’ current owners from their properties, they are a tool used as a very last resort to bring empty properties, which are a valuable and much need housing resource, back into use.”

He added: “Unfortunately, in this case, records held by NNC were outdated, and the letter was incorrectly sent to a property which was occupied. For this I am very sorry for causing any undue distress and worry.”

Reform UK candidate Ben Habib pounced on the situation, claiming: “I was horrified to hear the plight of Mr and Mrs Saunders, but my horror could not compare to what they experienced last month.”

He added: “The accusation made was their home was derelict and the Council intended to use it to house single young men seeking asylum. Known to the rest of us as illegal migrants.”