The Sentencing Council’s recent guidance asking the courts to consider the ethnic, cultural, and religious minority status of offenders as potential mitigating factors when pronouncing a judgement is the modern equivalent of the passing of the Nuremberg Laws of 1935.
Crime, according to our quangocrats, is no longer a function of a person’s sovereignty, it becomes the mechanical corollary of the arbitrary group to whom social scientists have assigned him.
The individual disappears as the group takes over.
To the result of his crimes is subtracted his race and religion in the equation of contemporary British official injustice.
Omitted from special treatment is the autochthonous and culturally Christian man, making him de facto a state subject without full rights.
As Robert Jenrick, the Conservative spokesman for Justice, noticed, these guidelines “enshrine an anti-white and anti-Christian bias in our criminal justice system”.
The Sentencing Council has officialised what most of us already knew: our justice system is not blind.
To make way for the supreme god of multiculturalism, the edifice of Judeo-Christian jurisprudence has been overturned.
Over decades, morality has been rewritten; right and wrong redefined; the law siloed, and justice served according to castes and religious backgrounds.
In this new world, books are judged by their cover.
Longstanding and cultural neighbours are hated rather than loved, making way for distant strangers, with no cultural ties to the nationals with whom they are asked to live and for whose culture they are invited not to care, because evil and ridden with generational guilt.
The 'two-tier' sentencing guidelines shatter what little faith we had left in our justice system, writes Alex Story
Getty Images
The first stone is hurled at the accused, if from the Christian caste.
If not from that cursed faith the fruits of which have been so visibly wholesome over millennia, but from the hallowed one of Islam for instance, then the tables promptly turn as the guilty is handed the stones to lapidate his victims.
No longer innocent until proven guilty, Christians are guilty because accused.
It must be understood that the atheist, who nonetheless wishes to live according to ancient standards of reciprocal law, is deemed second class as well.
His non-belief, as a faith, does not protect him.
The Sentencing Council’s official shattering of our already weakening faith in our justice system took Secretary of State for Justice Shabana Mahmood by theatrical surprise.
At the openly apartheid-like sectarian guidelines, she claimed, disingenuously it must be believed, to be “incandescent”, in the same way a rotund child would be if caught hands deep in a jar of penny sweets before blaming her parents for having bought them.
She explained that “I do not stand for any differential treatment before the law, for anyone of any kind. There will never be a two-tier system”.
Importantly, even if the council’s guidance is officially blocked, it will still be implemented in the facts. We can no longer unsee what was seen.
However, it seems our minister protests too much, we think.
Firstly, her representatives were at the meeting when the guidelines were agreed.
Further, when asked, her spokesman said “more broadly tackling race disparities in the criminal justice system remains a priority”, for the avoidance of doubt pointing once more at the supremacy of the god of multiculturalism above that of fairness and equality before the law.
Finally, she has supported all causes close to the Islington dweller’s heart.
She went on Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement against Israel marches, supported USAID funded Black Lives Matter, and was involved in the All-Party Parliamentary Group on British Muslims, who published their report in 2018.
The authors of it pushed to enshrine the definition of Islamophobia as being rooted in anti-Muslim racism, turning Mohammedanism from a cult to a race.
The key assertion made in the document was that there is no “good faith criticism of Islam”” – theological, historical or cultural.
We should therefore discount much of Mahmood’s melodramatic display of artificial discomfort.
After all, she said in a 2024 interview that her “faith is the centre point of my life and it drives me to public service, it drives me in the way that I live my life and I see my life”.
It is worth then pondering on the theology of Islam while we still can.
To pick one among many interesting verses, we read chapter 98:6 of the Koran. It says that “those who disbelieve from the People of the Book (Christians and Jews) and the polytheists (pagans – including atheists) will be in the Fire of Hell, to stay there forever. They are the worst of all beings” - worse that is than cockroaches and locusts.
How do such of many verses square with the Christian view that the individual is created in the image of his creator, all of whom are equal before Him, and therefore, deserving of natural, individual and reciprocal rights?
Crucially, alongside the Sentencing Council’s guideline’s stripping of rights for the large majority of men in the United Kingdom, Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner announced last month’s plans to establish a council on Islamophobia.
There are no prizes for guessing what the report will say. The findings are already baked in.
Any criticism of Islam will be deemed racist and applied retrospectively, “a process that would be invaluable for identifying and tackling Islamophobic crimes”.
To make matters even more certain, Dominic Grieves, who co-chaired the APPG on British Muslims, with Anna Soubry, has been identified as a leading candidate to be chairman of the council.
In 2017, both Grieves and Soubry probably felt that the APPG on British Muslim report was the safest way to pour their uncontrolled bile on the plebs for their Brexit act of lèse-majesté, assigning the Remainers’ defeat in the process to the innate (fictitious) racism and bigotry of the dastardly average Brit.
Peeing down his righteous trouser leg made him feel warm for a moment.
However, from Starmer’s perspective and his ilk, the hatred of the working man is longstanding. The white working man’s betrayal of the Labour Party in 1979 was never forgiven and warranted his replacement.
In practice, it meant purposefully moving away from the what Socialists in the 1980s called the “monolith”, that is the white, working, culturally Christian, home owning, politically unreliable, patriotic Britisher towards the majority-of-minorities, which would be permanently taxpayer funded via the quangocracy.
These would also be self-managed, acting independently and hydra-headed but always pushing in the same broad progressive anti-patriotic direction, providing plausible deniability to those in power.
Lying and deception were the tools. And the prize?
A defanged parliament and a one-party state for a deeply mediocre elite.
Evil, in its hubris, has grown so much that it has now become utterly shameless.
