Prince Harry's case is 'still live' as Duke of Sussex's lawyer provides key update on legal battle

The Duke of Sussex's barrister told the High Court that Harry “is one of two claimants whose claims are still live” against NGN over allegations of unlawful information gathering.

It is the latest development in the legal battle between the royal and the media group.

Last month, A High Court judge criticised the legal action involving Prince Harry and The Sun's publisher, describing it as a campaign between "obdurate but well-resourced armies" that is consuming an excessive amount of court time.

Mr Justice Fancourt expressed his concerns in a preliminary ruling, where he resolved disputes between the legal teams for the Duke of Sussex and NGN over amendments to Harry's pleaded case.

The judge stated: "I have previously indicated to the parties that this individual claim, although it raises important issues, is starting to absorb more than an appropriate share of the court's resources, contrary to the requirement in the overriding objective to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost."

A trial is scheduled for January 2025 at the High Court.

NGN has previously denied any unlawful activity at The Sun.

In his ruling, Mr Justice Fancourt highlighted the extensive disputes between the legal teams, noting: "I am faced with a table of disputes running to 44 pages, with 49 separate items or groups of items disputed, only a handful of which were eventually agreed, and 34 pages of dense submissions by NGN in support of their objections."

The judge granted permission for certain amendments to Harry's case while upholding some of NGN's objections.

Mr Justice Fancourt emphasised the urgent need for swift resolution of the case.

LATEST ROYAL NEWS:

• Princess Beatrice rushed back to UK to step up for King Charles amid his bitter feud with Prince Andrew
• Prince Harry fumbles Royal Family olive branch as Duke of Sussex and Meghan publicly snub King Charles
• Prince William returns to activity that 'fills Princess Kate with horror'

He stated: "It is clearly imperative that the content of the pleaded case is resolved as soon as possible."

The judge also reiterated his previous stance on the trial's timeline, saying: "I have also previously indicated that this claim will not be adjourned and will be either tried in January 2025 or settled, since it was issued as far back as September 2019 and has been stood out of eligibility for two previous listed trial dates. That remains the position."

Fancourt expressed frustration with the ongoing disputes, saying: "It is unsatisfactory to say the least that the court should be faced a second time with having to resolve such a large extent of disputed material on amendments to a statement of case."

He concluded by explaining that his ruling was intentionally brief due to the urgency of the case and ongoing trial preparations.