UK prepares weapon supplies 'war game' after Putin ramps up WW3 rhetoric over Storm Shadow Missile strike
GB NEWS
The Government is launching a new strategy in its defence department
The UK plans to conduct a "war game" simulating a large-scale conflict involving British troops as Vladimir Putin begins to ramp up World War Three rhetoric.
The new strategy will require military suppliers to demonstrate the ways in which they would produce a large number of critical weapons at pace - including drones and missile rockets.
This move follows wider concern that the UK would not be able to supply enough equipment for the front lines at short notice amid fears over the state of the industry’s resilience and flexibility.
Ministers have expressed concern that there is excessive focus on expensive, advanced equipment that takes a significant amount of time and resources although still vulnerable to newer technology, The Times reports.
One official emphasised that the developments in the Ukraine war was a “machine gun moment for the army and a jet-engine moment for the air force” (Stock)
PA
Additionally, government figures suggest that the conflict in Ukraine has depicted that “exquisite” military equipment such as state-of-the-art tanks, personnel carriers and warships are susceptible to drone attacks, which only cost around a few hundred pounds to produce.
One official emphasised that developments in the Ukraine war have been a “machine gun moment for the army and a jet-engine moment for the air force”.
Sources in the Ministry of Defence (MoD) told The Times that Ukraine’s drone technology was advancing every month or so, as they claimed that defence manufacturers were required to produce “high-impact but less time-incentive bits of kits” swiftly.
They said: “That is something we need to test to ensure we have the capability to do.
"In a protracted war you are only as strong as the industry that stands behind you.”
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
Defence secretary John Healey will outline the Government’s defence industrial strategy at the same time, urging stakeholders and industry bodies to provide insight in the sector, seeking greater integration and innovation across the sector.
He will aim to encourage job growth across “every nation and region of the UK”, arguing that a strong defence will set “the foundation for a decade of national renewal”.
Meanwhile, the Labour Chancellor has said that she would increase defence expenditure to 2.5 per cent of GDP next spring amid concerns that further spending should be spent on British growth.
The defence secretary added that Britain’s defence sector must be “better and more integrated” and was able to “keep our armed forces equipped, innovating at a wartime pace, and ahead of our adversaries”.
“We are sending a signal to the market and to our adversaries,” he said.
“With a strong UK defence sector we will make Britain secure at home and strong abroad.”
The defence secretary added that Britain’s defence sector must be “better and more integrated” and was able to “keep our armed forces equipped, innovating at a wartime pace, and ahead of our adversaries” (Stock)
PA
The adoption of this strategy has followed Ukraine launching British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles at Russia two weeks ago.
After the attack, President Putin said that the Ukraine war was developing into a global conflict due to the US and the UK allowed Ukraine to launch an attack on Russia, warning the Western powers that the Kremlin could retaliate.
He added that the Kremlin had fired a new hypersonic medium-range missile at a Ukrainian military facility, announcing that civilians would be warned of future attacks.
In a state address, Putin said: "From that moment, as we have repeatedly underscored, a regional conflict in Ukraine previously provoked by the West has acquired elements of a global character."
Following the Storm Shadow attack, Putin approved changes to a doctrine, widening the conditions under which the Kremlin was permitted to use its arsenal to launch a nuclear strike.
Now, an attack launched by a non-nuclear state - if supported by a nuclear power - would be considered a joint assault on Russia.